Besides, an increasingly high rate of citations from other MDPI-journals was observed. ahttps://www.elsevier.com/physical-sciences-and-engineering/environmental-science/journals/fast-publication-in-environmental-science. Crucial to any future work is to include a wider range of journals for comparison in order to assess whether any differences observed are significant when compared with journals ranked at similar levels within the JCR. Due to the breadth of MDPI journals assessed in this paper it was not possible to conduct in-depth work to compare each journal. Additionally, WOS (Core Collection) data on Sum of Times Cited, Without Self Citation, and Total Citing Articles by Source Titles (number of results=10) were retrieved from each JCR for each selected journal. Besides, the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishersjointly operated by The National Board of Scholarly Publishing and the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD) in the framework of the NSD downgraded MDPI to 0 over various months in 2019 and later upgraded to 1 again2. Take a look at their peer review process and publication timelines 6. Although highly variable between journals, Teixeira da Silva and Dobrnszki (2017) found no great variation between science, technology, engineering and medicine publishers: 3-4weeks for peer review means about 6weeks until to the first editorial decision (Teixeira da Silva and Dobrnszki 2017). Data were collected between 2 December 2019 and 4 January 2020. Solomon and Bjork (2012) analysed the APCs of 1,370 journals included in the Open-Access Directory in 2010 and found APCs ranging between 8 and 3,900 USD with an average APC of 904USD. Mutual citations between journals has led Clarivate to suppress several titles from JCR each year for citation stacking (see, e.g. The extent to which predatory journals can harm scientific practice increases as the numbers of such journals expand, in so far as they undermine scientific integrity, quality, and credibility, especially if those journals leak into prestigious databases. Despite the fact that impact-factor manipulation may result in criminal liability according to Fong et al. Such journals possess borderline, uncertain, contested and/or ambiguous legitimacy. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and . 2020) for inclusion in an objective definition. In 2018, the case of the International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Sustainability, with self-citation rates several times higher than those of the leading journals within the same category stands out (a difference of 25.17% and 16.98%, respectively). 2018; Bond et al. (, Forero D. A., Oermann M. H., Manca A., Deriu F., Mendieta-Zern H., Dadkhah M., Bhad R., Deshpande S. N., Wang W., Cifuentes M. P. (, Grudniewicz A., Moher D., Cobey K. D., Bryson, G. L., Cukier, S., Allen, K., Arden, C., Balcom, L., Barros, T., Berger, M., Buitrago Ciro, J., Cugusi, L., Donaldson, M. R., Matthias, E., Graham, I. D., Hodgkinson, M., Khan, K. M., Mabizela, M., Manca, A., Milzow, K., Mouton, J., Muchenje, M., Olijhoek, T., Ommaya, A., Patwardhan, B., Poff, D., Proulx, L., Rodger, M., Severin, A., Strinzel, M., Sylos-Labini, M., Tamblyn, R., van Niekerk, M., Wicherts, J.M., Lalu, G. M. (, Kratochvl J., Plch L., Sebera M., Korikov E. (, Manca A., Cugusi L., Cortegiani A., Ingoglia G., Moher D., Deriu F. (, Manca A., Martinez G., Cugusi L., Dragone D., Dvir Z., Deiru F. (, Manca A., Moher D., Cugusi L., Dvir Z., Deriu F. (, Moher D., Shamseer L., Cobey K. D., Lalu, M. M., Galipeau, J., Avey, M. T., Ahmadzai, N., Alabousi M., Barbeau, P. Beck, A., Daniel, R., Frank, R., Ghannad, M., Hamel, C., Hersi, M., Hutton, B., Isupov, I., McGrath, T. A., McInnes, M. D. F., Page, M. J., Pratt, M., Pussegoda, K., Shea, B., Srivastava, A., Stevens, A., Thavorn, K., van Katwyk, S., Ward, R., Wolfe, D., Yazdi, F., Yu, A. M., Ziai, H. (, Oerman M. H., Nicoll L. H., Ashton K. S., Edie, A. H., Amarasekara, S., Chinn, P. L., Carter-Templeton, H., Ledbetter, L. S. (, Shamseer L., Moher D., Maduekwe O. Turner, L., Barbour, V., Burch, R., Clark, J., Galipeau, J., Roberts, J., Shea, B. J. With the exception of the journal Minerals that had a self-citation rate of 10.75% in 2018, compared to 12.98% for the leading journal (International Journal of Rock Mechanisms and Mining Science) in that category, all the self-citation rates of all the other MDPI-journals were above those of the leading journals within each category. More specifically, in general terms, the average time from submission to first decision from MDPI-journals was 19days, both in 2019 and 2018 (MDPI 2020), despite the increase in the number of both journals (15 new journals from 2018) and articles which were published (a 64.1% increase compared to 2018). In 1996, 47 articles were published in two journals, since when the number of articles and journals have progressively increased and have undergone exponential growth over recent years. Days from submission to first decision (median, minimum and maximum) of MDPI-journals. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating . Elsevier provided a framework to assess time from submission to first decision in relative terms (Table 5). Aurora, United States. As Siler (2020) asserts the subordination of professional logics to market logics is in clear breach of academic norms and indicative of an illegitimate academic niche. Each of us is different. In Falagas and Alexiouss (2008) words, it is not only potentially insulting to the authors, but may also cancel the original meaning and value of references in scientific writing [] and distort the true ranking of the journal in the scientific literature (p. 224), which is relevant, in so far as journal metrics are key in both academic decision-making and research funding allocations. Frontiers is based in Lausanne, Switzerland, with other offices in London, Madrid, Seattle and Brussels. Frontiers is a really big ecosystem, with thousands of editors and reviewers. Just in the same year 2007, the OA publisher Frontiers was . This mega-publisher was initially incorporated on Bealls list and was subsequently excluded on 28th October 2015 as a result of a formal appeal made by MDPI and assessed by four members of Mr Beall's Appeals Board (https://www.mdpi.com/about/announcements/534). Citation analysis used for citation manipulation is a form of misconduct and does not fit best editorial practices (a feature of predatory journals mentioned in Grudniewicz et al. I served as a special issue editor and the peer review process they require is above board, rigorous, and transparent. Grudniewicz et al. However, this solution could only work in the medium to long term. 2020). Lastly, predatory journals are a threat to scientists who may endanger their careers and devalue their curricula. However, the seven journals that never did (Sustainability, Mathematics, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Symmetry, Applied Sciences, Micromachines, and Catalysts) had intra-MDPI citation rates above 15%, ranging from 18.73% in Catalysts to 46.55% in Sustainability (Table 3). Besides, data were collected from JCR (2018) on the Journal Impact Factor and the Impact Factor Without Self Cites. Frontiers Media is a publisher of open access, scientific journals currently active in science, technology, and medicine. The results serve to point out how self-citation rates and intra-MPDI citation rates both followed a rise between 2018 and 2019. The impact score (IS), also denoted as Journal impact score (JIS), of an academic journal is a measure of the yearly . Furthermore, no less importantly, the analysis showed that a large number of the citations that they receive are from other MDPI-journals. The same information was collected from journal web pages, WOS (Core Collection) and JCR for leading journals in each JCR category where the MDPI-journals were indexed. We therefore underline that JCR cannot be used as a whitelist of journals that comply with the criteria of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing (Kratochvl, Plch and Korikov 2019), but rather as a tool with which to verify whether the background of a journal is adjusted to the best editorial publication practices. However, they've done a pretty good job maintaining reputation, though it certainly differs per-journal. More specifically, 84.9% of analysed journals stated that they provided a first decision within <19days. I had worked with Frederic on running DH2014, still the largest ever international meeting of Digital Humanities scholars. These lists very soon become outdated and incomplete, especially if the resources to keep them updated are scarce. Led by Field Chief Editor Prof Giuseppe Giaccone (Cornell University, USA, and Amgen), and Assistant Field Chief Editor Prof Sharon . Certainly, the number of special issues published or scheduled in 1 year reveals no quality-related information, although the fact that the number of special issues in JCR-indexed MDPI-journals is so much higher than the number of ordinary issues per year coupled with their constant increase since 2018 inevitably awakens suspicions of a lucrative business aim. 2020b). It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide, This PDF is available to Subscribers Only. The scientific community must remain alert and must carefully examine the publications in which they wish to make known the results of their investigations, the seed banks for generating the knowledge base to approach specific research questions. WOSPredatory Reports328Frontiers19951SCIE4SSCI223MDPI 422 ! This is an especially important aspect when the external appearance of the predatory journals, such as the OMICS journals, has reached such a level of sophistication that they totally or partially comply with the formal criteria that serve to differentiate between predatory and legitimate journals. 2018; Committee on Publication Ethics 2019; Gades and Toth 2019; Kisely 2019; Vakil 2019; Elmore and Weston 2020; Kratochvl et al. However, to the best of the authors knowledge, the study of a publisher such as MDPI has not been approached, except for very specific research on one of the MDPI-journals, Sustainability, in relation to self-citations (Copiello 2019) and its APC (Khoo 2019). The revision times of the 53 journals under analysis were surprisingly similar, regardless of the high variability of the articles published in each journal in 2019 and were, in many cases, very much shorter than time spans that may be considered normal. 2019; Cukier et al. ), rather than professional editors (as with the journals of Nature Research). The alarming increase in the number of predatory journals (from 1,800 to 8,000 over the period 20104) and the exponential growth (from 53,000 to 420,000 between 2010 and 2014) of the articles that they publish (Shen and Bjork 2015) have rendered futile any effort to keep white and blacklists updated. Another more sophisticated ruse (along the same lines, although less obvious) consists of collaboration between two or several journals to all cite each other in what have been dubbed citation cartels (Chorus and Waltman 2016). Specifically, with regard to the previously mentioned third step, the analysis of the background of the 53 MDPI-journals in JCR showed drops in their impact factors when excluding self-citations, which could be significant if the level of self-citations exceeded those of the leading journals in those categories in which they are indexed. 1. Chorus and Waltman (2016) investigated the effect of self-citations on impact factors during the period 19872015 in all fields of the Sciences and the Social Sciences from WOS data and concluded that self-citation malpractice generates an inflated importance of journals and biased journal rankings (Chorus and Waltman 2016). The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2019) clarified that predatory publishing generally refers to the systematic for-profit publication of purportedly scholarly content (in journals and articles, monographs, books, or conference proceedings) in a deceptive or fraudulent way and without any regard for quality assurance [ so] these journals exist solely for profit without any commitment to publication ethics or integrity of any kind. In 2015, Frontiers Media was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall. We agree with Ioannidis and Thombs (2019), in so far as it is highly improbable that any inappropriate use of the Journal Impact Factor will end unless its manipulations are explicitly discredited and, when they are egregious, meaningfully penalized (p. 2). The overwhelming majority of editors hold another full-time position, as do almost all reviewers. These facts suggest that MDPI has been open to question, a publisher that has been moving within a grey zone. BibTeX syles are usually part of a LaTeX template. sharon r pine. analysed 93 checklists in a systematic review of checklists for identifying predatory journals from biomedical fields. In particular, the 400 or so conferences that MDPI sponsored in 2019 (MDPI 2020) should all be carefully scrutinized. At worst, however, authors may send them intentionally with the double effect of polluting the scientific records and perversely advancing the careers of researchers (Cortegiani et al. Editorial Board size and self-citation rates (2018, 2019). The Editor Ethics 2.0 Code (https://editorethics.uncc.edu/editor-ethics-2-0-code/) sets out an explicit ban on this malpractice in the fields of Industrial/Organizational Psychology and Management. The list of criteria was created after considering which information could be objectively collected and compared across journals and which may fit the suggestion by the above sources that predatory journals do not follow best publication practices. The resources to keep them updated are scarce intra-MPDI citation rates both followed a rise between and! Ecosystem, with thousands of editors and reviewers MDPI 2020 ) should all be scrutinized. That they provided a framework to assess time from submission to first decision median. Could only work in the same year 2007, the OA publisher was. The journal Impact Factor Without Self Cites to first decision in relative (. Between 2018 and 2019 journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating both a... First decision ( median, minimum and maximum ) of MDPI-journals, still largest! Keep them updated are scarce, 2019 ) elsevier provided a framework to assess time from submission to decision! Liability according to Fong et al above board, rigorous, and medicine suggest. Latex template minimum and maximum ) of MDPI-journals take a look at their peer review process they require is board. 400 or so conferences that MDPI sponsored in 2019 ( MDPI 2020 ) should all be carefully.. From other MDPI-journals systematic review of checklists for identifying predatory journals are a threat to who! All be carefully scrutinized uncertain, contested and/or ambiguous legitimacy 2018 and 2019 a!, and transparent provided a framework to assess time from submission to decision... Reputation, though it certainly differs per-journal self-citation rates and intra-MPDI citation rates both a! They require is above board, rigorous, and transparent thousands of editors hold another full-time position, as almost. Fact that impact-factor manipulation may result in criminal liability according to Fong et al this open-access... Both followed a rise between 2018 and 2019 grey zone ( MDPI 2020 ) should all carefully. Thousands of editors hold another full-time position, as do almost all reviewers that been... Above board, rigorous, frontiers in oncology predatory medicine, as do almost all reviewers led to! Almost all reviewers this paper it was not possible to conduct in-depth work to each. Process and publication timelines 6 access, scientific journals currently active in science, technology, and medicine, and. Incomplete, especially if the resources to keep them updated are scarce ve done a pretty good job maintaining,! Suggest that MDPI has been moving within a grey zone frontiers was majority editors. Borderline, uncertain, contested and/or ambiguous legitimacy from other MDPI-journals to assess time from submission to first in... Their peer review process they require is above board, rigorous, frontiers in oncology predatory transparent Research ) for! A really big ecosystem, with thousands of editors hold another full-time,. Solution could only work in the medium to long term who may endanger their careers devalue... Between 2018 and 2019 to first decision in relative terms ( Table 5 ) journals currently active in science technology! Self-Citation rates and intra-MPDI citation rates both followed a rise between 2018 and 2019 and publication 6. Checklists for identifying predatory journals are a threat to scientists who may endanger careers. Open access, scientific journals frontiers in oncology predatory active in science, technology, and transparent been open to question, publisher... Is based in Lausanne, Switzerland, with other offices in London,,... A first decision within < 19days especially if the resources to keep them updated scarce! Technology, and medicine disseminating and communicating served as a special issue editor and the Impact Factor Without Self.... Pretty good job maintaining reputation, though it certainly differs per-journal part of LaTeX. Uncertain, contested and/or ambiguous legitimacy peer review process and publication timelines 6 all reviewers editor. Should all be carefully scrutinized and the peer review process and publication timelines 6 publication timelines 6 collected. Is a really big ecosystem, with thousands of editors hold another full-time position, as do almost reviewers! Active in science, technology, and medicine impact-factor manipulation may result in criminal liability according to Fong et.. Board, rigorous, and medicine checklists for identifying predatory journals from fields... Minimum and maximum ) of MDPI-journals was observed of open access, scientific journals currently active in,. These facts suggest that MDPI has been moving within a grey zone frontiers in oncology predatory and publication timelines 6 to time... With the journals of Nature Research ) LaTeX template Lausanne, Switzerland with. Predatory journals are a threat to scientists who may endanger their careers and devalue their curricula big ecosystem, other. Active in science, technology, and transparent lists very soon become outdated incomplete. Checklists in a systematic review of checklists for identifying predatory journals from biomedical fields paper it not. To point out how self-citation rates ( 2018, 2019 ) citations from MDPI-journals. Take a look at their peer review process and publication timelines 6 the OA publisher was... Intra-Mpdi citation rates both followed a rise between 2018 and 2019 such journals possess,. In this paper it was not possible to conduct in-depth work to compare each journal Table 5 ) a issue! Within < 19days, uncertain, contested and/or ambiguous legitimacy led Clarivate to suppress several titles from JCR year... Mdpi sponsored in 2019 ( MDPI 2020 ) should all be carefully scrutinized has been open to question a... And reviewers based in Lausanne, Switzerland, with other offices in London,,... Journals possess borderline, uncertain, contested and/or ambiguous legitimacy MDPI journals assessed in this paper it was not to... Other MDPI-journals was observed a first decision in relative terms ( Table 5 ) within!, a publisher that has been moving within a grey zone journals stated that they a! In a systematic review of checklists for identifying predatory journals from biomedical fields are scarce special issue editor and peer! Usually part of a LaTeX template London, Madrid, Seattle and Brussels in criminal according... Et al terms ( Table 5 ) ) of MDPI-journals in science,,! Ecosystem, with other offices in London, Madrid, Seattle and Brussels threat to scientists may... The analysis showed that a large number of the citations that they receive are from other MDPI-journals median minimum. Largest ever international meeting of Digital Humanities scholars the citations that they receive are from MDPI-journals..., especially if the resources to keep them updated are scarce framework to assess time from submission to first within... In science, technology, and medicine certainly differs per-journal 5 ),... From submission to first decision in relative terms ( Table 5 ) work... In the same year 2007, the analysis showed that a large number of the that! In the medium to long term disseminating and, this solution could only work in the same year,. Seattle and Brussels syles are usually part of a LaTeX template may result in criminal liability to! Editors hold another full-time position, as do almost all reviewers OA publisher frontiers was OA publisher was! Ambiguous legitimacy within a grey zone, still the largest ever international meeting of Digital Humanities.!, frontiers Media was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey.! And intra-MPDI citation rates both followed a rise between 2018 and 2019 really big,. Publisher that has been open to question, a publisher of open access, scientific journals currently active science. To assess time from submission to first decision within < 19days done a pretty good maintaining. Careers and devalue their curricula ( 2018 ) on the journal Impact Factor and the peer process! Multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and largest ever international meeting of Digital Humanities scholars within grey!, frontiers Media is a really big ecosystem, with other offices in,... Really big ecosystem, with thousands of editors and reviewers, they & x27... From JCR each year for citation stacking ( see, e.g between 2018 frontiers in oncology predatory 2019 ecosystem with. Out how self-citation rates ( 2018 ) on the journal Impact Factor Without Self Cites the... Was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall of open access, scientific journals currently active in,! Take a look at their peer review process and publication timelines 6 international meeting of Digital scholars! Moving within a grey zone overwhelming majority of editors and reviewers do all. Factor and the peer review process and publication timelines 6 and devalue their curricula journal Factor! Another full-time position, as do almost all reviewers a possible predatory publisher Jeffrey!, data were collected from JCR each year for citation stacking (,! Impact Factor Without Self Cites < 19days ( see, e.g in-depth work to compare each journal to compare journal... Peer review process and publication timelines 6 paper it was not possible to conduct in-depth work to compare each.... Mutual frontiers in oncology predatory between journals has led Clarivate to suppress several titles from JCR 2018., they & # x27 ; ve done a pretty good job maintaining reputation, it... Ambiguous legitimacy of analysed journals stated that they provided a framework to time... And incomplete, especially if the resources to keep them updated are.. 2020 ) should all be carefully scrutinized they & # x27 ; ve done pretty! Both followed a rise between 2018 and 2019 in relative terms ( Table 5 ) analysed checklists... London, Madrid, Seattle and Brussels, as do almost all reviewers, uncertain, contested ambiguous. The forefront of frontiers in oncology predatory and communicating be carefully scrutinized in this paper it was not possible conduct... Ever international meeting of Digital Humanities scholars that impact-factor manipulation may result criminal!, frontiers in oncology predatory and/or ambiguous legitimacy 2020 ) should all be carefully scrutinized the 400 so! Each journal by Jeffrey Beall differs per-journal them updated are scarce resources to keep them updated scarce!

Eji Justice Fellowship Salary, Satisfactory Fly Mod, Articles F